2016 (12) TMI 724
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Kulvinder Singh, Advocate, for the appellant Sh. H. Singh, AR, for the respondent PER: ASHOK JINDAL The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order demanding interest on the appellant. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellants were clearing inputs as such on reversal of equal cenvat credit on the last day of the month. The case of the Revenue is that in case of the input....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... has been paid by reversing cenvat credit at the end of each month, therefore, there is no default at the end of the each month. Hence, the demand of interest is not sustainable. 4. On the other hand the Ld. AR reiterated the finding in the impugned order. 5. Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 6. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both the sides, we find th....
TaxTMI