2016 (12) TMI 387
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent ORDER This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. US/455/RGD/2011 dated 30.11.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-II. 2. After hearing both sides and perusal of the records, I find that the issue involved in this case is regarding rejection of refund claim of Rs. 1 lakh. The appellant had deposited an amount of Rs. 1 lakh as a pre-deposit ordere....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... deposited on the direction of the Tribunal. I also find that the appellant had produced a Chartered Accountant's certificate dated 3.5.2011 which also indicates that the appellant had maintained that this amount is receivable from the Excise Department and not expressed out. I find that the first appellate authority has overlooked to these crucial evidences, which supported the claim of the appel....
TaxTMI