2016 (12) TMI 387
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent ORDER This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. US/455/RGD/2011 dated 30.11.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-II. 2. After hearing both sides and perusal of the records, I find that the issue involved in this case is regarding rejection of refund claim of Rs. 1 lakh. The appellant had deposited an amount of Rs. 1 lakh as a pre-deposit ordere....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... deposited on the direction of the Tribunal. I also find that the appellant had produced a Chartered Accountant's certificate dated 3.5.2011 which also indicates that the appellant had maintained that this amount is receivable from the Excise Department and not expressed out. I find that the first appellate authority has overlooked to these crucial evidences, which supported the claim of the appel....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI