<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the rejection of a refund claim of Rs. 1 lakh based on unjust enrichment. Evidence presented, including a Ledger Account and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, demonstrated that the amount was not collected from customers but was receivable from the Excise Department. The Tribunal found no unjust enrichment and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 387 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the rejection of a refund claim of Rs. 1 lakh based on unjust enrichment. Evidence presented, including a Ledger Account and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate, demonstrated that the amount was not collected from customers but was receivable from the Excise Department. The Tribunal found no unjust enrichment and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>