2016 (11) TMI 553
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. S. Mathew, Adv., Mr. A. Majumder, Adv. for the Petitioners. Mr. R.N. Das, Sr. Adv. Appears with Ms. A. Rajyashree, Adv. For the Respondents. ORDER The Court : Since the issues of law and fact raised in these writ petitions are common, the same have been taken up for consideration together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The lead matter is W.P. NO.473 of 2016. In....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ax Infomatics Ltd. -vs- Union of India & Ors.) which the petitioner perceived to be of immense worth in support of its claim, were placed before the Commissioner for her consideration, but were not considered at all. Non-application of mind by the Commissioner is, thus, apparent. 4. Although an appellate remedy is available to the petitioner, this Bench is not inclined to relegate it to the app....
TaxTMI