2016 (11) TMI 552
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by letter dated 5.8.2014 issued by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Garhwa, addressed to the In-charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Center, Meral, Garhwa, bearing Memo No. 1710 dated 05.8.2014, which was also communicated to the petitioner under Memo No. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er dated 05.8.2014 asked the In-charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Meral, Garhwa to make available the information, as sought for under the RTI Act. The said letter was communicated to the petitioner by the In-charge Medical Officer, Meral Garhwa, asking her to make available the documents relating to her appointment and the educational qualification, as sought for. 4. Learned couns....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cing reliance on these decisions, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the personal information relating to the petitioner is being sought for by letter contained in Annexure-3 to the writ application, it is a fit case for quashing the same. 7. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer, submitting that the information sought for in the present c....
TaxTMI