2016 (2) TMI 952
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rma, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order demanding duty and imposing redemption fine and penalty on them by way of impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that at the premises No. F-10, Opposite Vijaya Bank, Samaypur Badli, Delhi-42, a seizure took place on 27-11-2007 wherein certain goods with the brand name of the appellant was f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e matter was adjudicated, duty was demanded from the appellant and redemption fine of Rs. 1,10,000/- was imposed. A penalty of Rs. 1,82,437/- was also imposed on the appellant. Aggrieved from the said order, the appellant is before me. 3. Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is not the owner of the said goods. Although, these goods having the brand name of the appellant....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI