https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188018 The appellant successfully appealed against duty, redemption fine, and penalties imposed on them after goods bearing their brand names were seized. The Member (J) found that the seized goods were not owned by the appellant, who explained their cash sales practice. Consequently, the duty demand and penalties were deemed unsustainable. The impugned order demanding duty and penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188018 The appellant successfully appealed against duty, redemption fine, and penalties imposed on them after goods bearing their brand names were seized. The Member (J) found that the seized goods were not owned by the appellant, who explained their cash sales practice. Consequently, the duty demand and penalties were deemed unsustainable. The impugned order demanding duty and penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188018