2016 (11) TMI 314

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent ORDER (Per : Honourable Mr. Justice Akil Kureshi) 1. Petitioner has prayed for a protection against recovery in connection with an order in original dated 25.01.2001, which by way of a second appeal is subject matter before the CESTAT in Appeal No. E1227/ 03. It is undisputed that in such appeal, the Tribunal had granted stay against the recoveries. The petitioner was granted per....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad to Deputy Registrar, CESTAT, Mumbai, we gather that till such date, the appeal papers were not received by the Tribunal at Ahmedabad. In this background, the case of the petitioner is that the stay extension application could not be decided by the CESTAT, Ahmedabad. The petitioner is not responsible for any delay either in hearing of the appeal or in pursuing the application for extension of st....