https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334296 The Court decided not to vacate the stay granted in 2003, instructing the petitioner to reconstruct the appeal before the Tribunal by a specified date and prioritize its consideration. No coercive recovery was permitted during this period. If the Tribunal failed to decide by the deadline, the petitioner could apply for an extension of stay. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334296 The Court decided not to vacate the stay granted in 2003, instructing the petitioner to reconstruct the appeal before the Tribunal by a specified date and prioritize its consideration. No coercive recovery was permitted during this period. If the Tribunal failed to decide by the deadline, the petitioner could apply for an extension of stay. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334296