2016 (6) TMI 1136

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....R.-for the respondent Per R.K. Singh: Appeal is filed against the order in appeal dated 4.12.2009   in terms of which the service tax refund of Rs. 75,427/- for the period 1.4.2008 to 30.6.2008 under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was rejected on the following grounds: (i) Refund claim on THC charges, bills of lading charges, origin haulage charges, repo charges rejected on the grounds ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the appellant pleaded that the grounds mentioned in (i) to (iv) have been held to be untenable for rejecting the refund claims vide CESTAT Final order No. ST/A/53916-53918/16-CU dated 26.11.2015 in the case of Shivam Exports & Ors. Vs. CCE, Jaipur., SRF Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur  2015-TIOL-2241-DEL(CESTAT) and Final Order No. ST/A/54038-54068/14-CU dated 16.10.2014 in the case of Suncity Art Expo....