https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187472 Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was held admissible for export-related services already covered by earlier Tribunal rulings, because those objections had been rejected in the same controversy. The assessee did not press the claim for cleaning activity and technical inspection and certification services, so no relief was granted for those items. The operative effect was that documentary or substantive objections could not defeat the refund for the covered services, while the unpressed service categories remained outside the refund claim. en-us Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:46:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187472 Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was held admissible for export-related services already covered by earlier Tribunal rulings, because those objections had been rejected in the same controversy. The assessee did not press the claim for cleaning activity and technical inspection and certification services, so no relief was granted for those items. The operative effect was that documentary or substantive objections could not defeat the refund for the covered services, while the unpressed service categories remained outside the refund claim. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187472