2016 (10) TMI 288

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an Bhatia, Brief Holder JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, CJ. Revisionist call in question the order passed by the Commercial Tax Tribunal. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has affirmed the order passed by the First Appellate Authority, by which the latter Authority had imposed condition of deposit of 50% of the tax and granted stay regarding the rest 50%. 2. We heard Mr. S.K. Posti, learned co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st Appellate Authority. The basis of the revisionist's case appears to be an interim order passed by this Court in a Revision challenging the final decision and, therefore, the learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that, as a matter of propriety, the Tribunal should have followed the same and granted stay of collection of 75% of the tax due, which was what was done in that case. The sub....