https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333268 The challenge to an interlocutory stay order was confined to whether the Tribunal's refusal to disturb a conditional stay of tax demand raised any substantial question of law in revision. The High Court found that the First Appellate Authority had granted stay on deposit of 50% of the tax and stayed recovery of the balance, and that this interim arrangement did not disclose any substantial question of law warranting revisional interference. The revision was therefore held not maintainable on the grounds advanced and was dismissed. en-us Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:35:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333268 The challenge to an interlocutory stay order was confined to whether the Tribunal's refusal to disturb a conditional stay of tax demand raised any substantial question of law in revision. The High Court found that the First Appellate Authority had granted stay on deposit of 50% of the tax and stayed recovery of the balance, and that this interim arrangement did not disclose any substantial question of law warranting revisional interference. The revision was therefore held not maintainable on the grounds advanced and was dismissed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333268