2016 (10) TMI 81

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ran, Technical Member Present Shri Sharad Bhansali and Shri Jitendra Singh, Advocates for the Appellant Present Shri Amit Singh, Advocate for the Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce Present Shri Govind Dixit, A.R. for the Revenue ORDER The appeal is against the Final Finding dated 14.11.2011 of Designated Authority (DA), Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties, Ministry....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Authority is without proper consultation with Domestic Industry. The disclosure statement or the Final Finding did not give any justification for resorting to variable duties instead of fixed AD Duties. It is the case of the appellant that the recommendation of the Designated Authority is arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Rule 4 (d) of Anti Dumping rules. The type of duty imposed has a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd conclusions drawn by the Designated Authority. There is no deviation of any procedure or requirement in the processe. 4. Having heard all the sides, as above, we find that the appellant is apparently aggrieved by the Final Finding and the Customs Notification only to the effect of methodology of calculating AD duty. We note that AD duty in the present case was fixed as amount equal to the diff....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vestigation into dumping, injury and the causal link thereof, in terms of Anti Dumping Rules finally established positive dumping margin as well as material injury to the Domestic Industry. Considering the said dumping margin, the Designated Authority recommended AD duty to offset dumping and consequently injury to the Domestic Industry. It is clear that the Designated Authority followed lesser du....