<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 81 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333061</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty may be structured by reference to a constant reference price rather than as a fixed quantum where the investigation is conducted in accordance with the anti-dumping rules and the lesser duty principle is applied. The challenge was confined to the method of quantification, while the findings on dumping margin, injury margin and material injury were not specifically disputed on facts or data. In the absence of positive evidence showing a serious error in the underlying analysis, the Tribunal declined to interfere with the authority&#039;s discretion in choosing the form of duty, and the reference price-based duty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:12:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 81 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333061</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty may be structured by reference to a constant reference price rather than as a fixed quantum where the investigation is conducted in accordance with the anti-dumping rules and the lesser duty principle is applied. The challenge was confined to the method of quantification, while the findings on dumping margin, injury margin and material injury were not specifically disputed on facts or data. In the absence of positive evidence showing a serious error in the underlying analysis, the Tribunal declined to interfere with the authority&#039;s discretion in choosing the form of duty, and the reference price-based duty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>