1981 (3) TMI 257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the Bombay High Court dated Dec. 3, 1968 arising out of Land Acquisition Proceedings taken under the erstwhile Hyderabad Land Acquisition Act. The admitted position, as found by the High Court, seems to be that the land in dispute is situated in the city of Jalna which is a developing town and in the neighbourhood of the plot in dispute a grain market has already been built. Several other muni....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....State. It is clear from these sales that the situation of these plots has played a very important role in the price obtained by them. 2. The High Court pointed out that the evidence of Mohanlal Deep Chand has not been challenged on behalf of the State In these circumstances, therefore, this was a very reasonable and adequate basis for determining the compensation of the land in dispute. Again a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....challenged and was not contested by the State. Thus taking the case at the lowest even if Rs. 15 per sq. yard is held to be the correct sale value of the land and deducting 1/3rd a; the area was not fully developed, the minimum compensation that could be awarded to the appellant would be at the rate of Rs. 10 per sq. yard. This Court in the case of Tribeni Devi v. Collector of Ranchi has observed ....