2016 (9) TMI 617

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DS Legal, for the Petitioner Mr. Beni Chatterjee, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, Mr. M. S. Bhardwaj, Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Ms. Neeta V. Masurkar, Mr. S. G. Thakur, for the Respondents ORDER P. C. Heard both sides. The order passed and contained in several communications is impugned in the Writ Petitions for it purports to deny the Petitioners, the deemed export drawback under All ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... at no stage, the Petitioners were given a proper opportunity of being heard nor the impugned order is passed based on their written representations and points raised during oral hearing. 4. The request of the Petitioner is denied only by addressing some letters and which outlines the stand of the Respondents emanating from the Development Commissioner SEEPZ, Special Economic Zone. This hardly sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s a refund application under the duty draw back and for the relevant period. The claim of the Petitioner is that the supplies made from the domestic tariff unit to the export oriented unit are eligible for refund on All Industry Draw Back Rate and draw back application should be processed accordingly. 7. The Petitioner complained throughout that they have not heard anything from the authorities. ....