2016 (9) TMI 616

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2016<br>W.P.No.29693 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.36057 of 2004 - -<br>Customs<br>T. S. Sivagnanam, J. For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Senniappan For the Respondents : Mr.K.Magesh, Mr.K.Jayachandran ORDER Heard Mr.R.Senniappan, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.K.Magesh, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 6 and Mr.K.Jayachandran, learned counsel for the 7th respondent. 2. The petitioner c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the case of Cannon Steels P. Ltd. (supra), ultimately, the Hon&#39;ble Supreme Court held that the Punjab & Haryana High Court was jusitified in its view as the Origional adjudication order and the appellate order were not issued by any authority within its territorial jurisdiction, but considering that no person should be left without the remedy though the case was withdrawn by the assessee, dir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onal Insurance Company Ltd., (supra), arose out of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and by taking into consideration clause (2) of Article 226, the decision was rendered. Nevertheless, when there is a conclusion that the litigation amounts to forum shopping, the Court would refuse to exercise discretion to entertain a writ petition. In this regard, reference was made ....