2016 (9) TMI 313
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM For the Petitioner : Mr.R.Kumar For the Respondent: Mr. S. Kanmani Annamalai, A.G.P., COMMON ORDER Heard Mr.R.Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2.The petitioner has challenged the orders of assessment dated 15.06.2016 under the provisions of the Tamil Nad....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....same was not granted. Therefore, the learned Additional Government Pleader was directed to get instructions from the Assessing Officer on the above submission. 5. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer has given a reply to the learned Special Government Pleader vide letter dated 22.08.2016, in which it has been stated that for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2013-14, the petitioner did not seek for....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ring. 7. Furthermore, the transaction in respect of all the assessment years is identical and when the respondent chose to pass a separate assessment orders for all the years on the same date, nothing prevented the respondent from affording an opportunity of personal hearing. 8. The necessity to offer personal hearing has been emphasized by this Court in several decisions, since an ass....
TaxTMI