<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 313 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332052</link>
    <description>The court set aside the assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for the years 2007-08 to 2013-14 due to the denial of a personal hearing and non-consideration of documents by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of personal hearings in complex assessment proceedings for accurate revenue collection. It directed the Assessing Officer to redo the assessments for all years after granting a personal hearing and reviewing all documents provided by the petitioner, allowing the submission of additional relevant documents during the hearing. The writ petitions were allowed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 23:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 313 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332052</link>
      <description>The court set aside the assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for the years 2007-08 to 2013-14 due to the denial of a personal hearing and non-consideration of documents by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of personal hearings in complex assessment proceedings for accurate revenue collection. It directed the Assessing Officer to redo the assessments for all years after granting a personal hearing and reviewing all documents provided by the petitioner, allowing the submission of additional relevant documents during the hearing. The writ petitions were allowed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>