2016 (8) TMI 464

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of surrender made by the assessee under section 132(4) of the Income tax Act, 1961 during the course of search on 31.07.2009 as well as during post search proceedings on 17.09.2009 under section 131 of the Income tax Act, 1961. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CIT (A) has erred in deleting this addition without appreciating the facts of the case that despite the surrender was made by the assessee itself under section 132(4) of the Income tax Act, however, the same was not disclosed in the return of income filed under section 153A of the Income tax Act, 1961, and no tax was paid on it accordingly. 3. On the facts and in the circumstan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Finance Co (P) Ltd., business premises of 4/4A, Stock Exchange Building, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi - 110 002 which was also covered u/s. 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was centralized with this Circle by order u/s. 127 of the Act and accordingly notice u/s. 153A of the Act was issued to the assessee on 5.1.2010. In response to the same, return declaring an income of Rs. 17,60,947/- was filed on 31.5.2010. Notice u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act, 1961 were issued alongwith a questionnaire dated 14.9.2010. Due to change of Officer, fresh Notice again issued on 26.6.2011 for 8.7.2011. In response to various statutory notices, Authorised Representative of the assessee attended the proceedings from time to time and furnished necessa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ders Pvt. Ltd.; DCIT vs. Ramprastha Greens (P) Ltd. and DCIT vs. Ramparasthan Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. passed in ITA No. 3238/Del/2013 (AY 2010-11); 3239/Del/2013; 3240 & 4341/Del/2013 (AY 2010-11 & 2009-10) respectively and stated that in the related group of cases similar issue has been dealt by the Tribunal and the addition in dispute has been deleted. Accordingly, he requested that by following the ITAT order and by upholding the Ld. CIT(A)'s order, Appeal of the Revenue may be dismissed. 7. We have heard the both parties and perused and considered the relevant records available with us especially the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A). We find that Ld. First Appellate Authority has elaborately discussed the issue in dis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Group and other persons. The substantive part of answer, Sh. Balwant Singh has stated that mostly the transactions are recorded in books of accounts and some parts are unaccounted. Ld AR has argued that entire seized document was examined during post search and assessment proceeding and no incriminating material was found. Subsequent statements were recorded in the Investigation Wings as mentioned in the assessment order. However no question was asked in furtherance of the statement regarding the contents of seized document. During original statement also subsequent details of work-in-progress, such as address, quantum of work done, accounted work-in- progress and undisclosed work in progress were not asked for. The appellant company during....