<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 464 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete an addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000 made under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) found that the addition lacked proper documentary evidence, the surrender was not disclosed in the return of income, and no tax was paid on it. The Tribunal agreed that there was no correlation between seized documents and the surrendered amount, no incriminating material was found post-search, and the surrender was based on mistaken facts. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing lack of evidence and supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s detailed analysis and precedent in related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=438122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 464 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete an addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000 made under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) found that the addition lacked proper documentary evidence, the surrender was not disclosed in the return of income, and no tax was paid on it. The Tribunal agreed that there was no correlation between seized documents and the surrendered amount, no incriminating material was found post-search, and the surrender was based on mistaken facts. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing lack of evidence and supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s detailed analysis and precedent in related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>