Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (1) TMI 399

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on the preliminary issue as to whether the suit is barred by limitation. No doubt, this appeal itself is filed with an application for condonation of delay u/S. 5 of the Limitation Act, but for deciding the point raised in (he appeal, we are not taking notice of the S. 5 application. The first respondent filed a suit for recovery of damages for the tort of libel. The alleged insinuation i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the plaint were not attested as true copies ; (iii) the photo copy of a document was in Hindi and it was neither accompanied by translation in English nor the translation charges were paid. Therefore, the plaint was returned to the plaintiff on 15.9 1987 for rectifying objections. It was, however, refiled on 16.10 1987. On 17.10.1987 the Registry returned the plaint pointing out that objection ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) Rules, 1967 framed u/Ss. 122 and 129oftheC.P.C. and S. 7 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966. The relevant rules are : "1. Presentation at the counter-All plaints, applications and documents shall be presented by the plaintiff, at the filing counter. All such documents filed in Court shall be accompanied by an index in duplicate containing their details. The amounts of court fee affixed o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., and for this purpose may allow to the party concerned such reasonable time as he may consider necessary. (b) Where the party fails to take any step for the removal of the defect within the time fixed for the same, the Registrar may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, decline to register the document. (c) Any party aggrieved by any order made by the Registrar under this rule may, within fifte....