https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185271 A plaint presented within the limitation period does not become time-barred merely because the Registry returns it for curing curable defects and it is refiled later. In a libel damages suit, the relevant one-year limitation ran from publication, but the original presentation was within time. Defects relating to court fee, attestation of copies, and translation requirements were procedural and did not alter the date of institution. The plaint was therefore treated as filed on its original presentation date, and the limitation objection failed. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:46:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185271 A plaint presented within the limitation period does not become time-barred merely because the Registry returns it for curing curable defects and it is refiled later. In a libel damages suit, the relevant one-year limitation ran from publication, but the original presentation was within time. Defects relating to court fee, attestation of copies, and translation requirements were procedural and did not alter the date of institution. The plaint was therefore treated as filed on its original presentation date, and the limitation objection failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185271