2006 (2) TMI 662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, for the Appellant. Shri Sanjay Kumar, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER Heard both sides and perused the record. Though the matter is posted today for consideration of stay application, upon perusing the record and hearing both sides, it is felt that appeal itself can be disposed of. Accordingly, after waiving the requirement for pre-deposit, I take up the appeal. 2. The appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r's Contractor - 2005 (188) E.L.T. 454. I may read paras 5 and 6 of the Tribunal's Order in this connection : "5. The contention of the Revenue is that the respondents are registered prior to Extra Ordinary Tax Payer Friendly Scheme and not registered this immunity scheme. Therefore, are liable to penal action. 6. I find that the service provider who registered and paid....