<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed for delay in service tax deposit. The appellant&#039;s reliance on a Government amnesty scheme exempting penalties for timely deposits was upheld, following a previous Tribunal decision. The Tribunal emphasized that service providers complying with the scheme&#039;s terms were not liable for penalties. This case underscores the relevance of Government amnesty schemes and the weight given to previous Tribunal rulings in determining penalty exemptions for delayed tax payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=435311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 662 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed for delay in service tax deposit. The appellant&#039;s reliance on a Government amnesty scheme exempting penalties for timely deposits was upheld, following a previous Tribunal decision. The Tribunal emphasized that service providers complying with the scheme&#039;s terms were not liable for penalties. This case underscores the relevance of Government amnesty schemes and the weight given to previous Tribunal rulings in determining penalty exemptions for delayed tax payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>