Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (12) TMI 877

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndent : None ORDER G. A. Brahma Deva (Judicial Member) This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the impugned order No. 197/ 2000(H-I)CE dated 25.10.2000 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad. Matter is posted to hear the stay petition. On going through the issue involved herein, I find that the matter itself can be disposed off. Accordingly, stay applicat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....064 dt. 27.6.97 issued by M/s. Hoechst Schering AgrEvo Ltd., was rejected in view of lack of authentication by the Superintendent of Central Excise, vide letter No. OC 789/98 dt. 6.1.98. They submitted that the supplier has issued the invoice without authentication by the Superintendent of Central Excise. When this lapse was pointed out by the Range authorities at Hyderabad, the invoice was sent t....