Modvat credit limitation cannot defeat substantial compliance when departmental objection prevented the prescribed register entry.

Modvat credit could not be denied as time-barred where the assessee had entered the invoice particulars in its statutory records within a short time and the omission to make the RG 23A Part I/II entry arose from departmental objection to authentication of the invoice. The six-month limit under Rule 57G(5) was not applied mechanically in these circumstances, because the assessee had substantially complied with the record-keeping requirement and the delay in the prescribed credit register was not attributable to it. The ex parte order rejecting credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee's entitlement to Modvat credit was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether denial of Modvat credit as time-barred under Rule 57G(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was justified when the invoice particulars were entered in the statutory records within a short time and the assessee was prevented from making the RG 23A entry because of departmental objection.

Analysis: The appeal turned on whether the six-month restriction could be applied mechanically where the assessee had recorded the invoice particulars in Form IV within one month of issuance and the failure to enter the matter in RG 23A Part I/II was attributable to the Department's objection regarding authentication of the invoice. In these circumstances, the earlier appellate finding that the credit could not be denied merely on the ground of delay was accepted, and the ex parte order rejecting the credit was held unsustainable.

Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit on the ground of limitation was not justified and the assessee's claim was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The Department's challenge failed, and the order allowing the assessee's Modvat credit was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: A procedural time limit for Modvat credit cannot be invoked to deny credit where the assessee has substantially complied by timely recording the receipt in its registers and the non-entry in the prescribed credit register resulted from departmental objection.

---