2007 (8) TMI 236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....auction for disposal of the imported goods of Respondent No.5 by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. One of the terms of sale was that the sale had to be confirmed by respondent No.3 within 20 days failing which, the petitioner has to apply for refund of the money deposited. The sale was not confirmed. 2. In the meantime the Respondent No.5 applied for release of the goods. It is their case that they coul....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Yogesh Kalidas Shah vs. Union of India, 1993 (64) E.L.T. 162 (S.C.) to contend that they are entitled to claim solatium at the rate of 10% and in the alternative they should be paid interest as the amount has been lying with the respondent No.3. 5. On behalf of the respondent No.3 their learned Counsel points out that they are entitled to dammurage ch....