https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3540 The court ruled in favor of Respondent No.5, denying the petitioners' claim for solatium and interest due to the unconfirmed sale of imported goods. The court directed the parties to adhere to specific deadlines for payment of assessed duty, release of goods, and handling of the deposited amount. It emphasized the importance of timely duty payment by Respondent No.5 and outlined corresponding actions based on fulfillment or non-fulfillment of this condition. The judgment concluded by making the rule absolute without imposing any cost orders. en-us Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3540 The court ruled in favor of Respondent No.5, denying the petitioners' claim for solatium and interest due to the unconfirmed sale of imported goods. The court directed the parties to adhere to specific deadlines for payment of assessed duty, release of goods, and handling of the deposited amount. It emphasized the importance of timely duty payment by Respondent No.5 and outlined corresponding actions based on fulfillment or non-fulfillment of this condition. The judgment concluded by making the rule absolute without imposing any cost orders. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3540