2006 (8) TMI 116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dents. 2. Rule. Made returnable forthwith. 3. The petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissing the application for condonation of delay in filing the petitioner's appeal, which order was passed on 16^th November, 2005 and the subsequent order dated 4^th May, 2006 declining to restore the appeal. 4. It has so happened that when....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orts to contact the petitioner. The petitioner had requested her to appear in the matter, but she had not received necessary instructions and therefore she had informed Mr. Nadkarni by giving him letter that no instructions were forthcoming from the party and that the matter be adjourned. She told the Tribunal that instead of whatever was instructed to Mr. Nadkarni, the Bench noted that he had no ....