<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3522</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders dismissing the application for condonation of delay and refusal to restore the appeal. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for further consideration, emphasizing that the party should not suffer due to advocate-related issues. The petitioner was directed to pay a cost of Rs. 3000 to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 116 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3522</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders dismissing the application for condonation of delay and refusal to restore the appeal. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for further consideration, emphasizing that the party should not suffer due to advocate-related issues. The petitioner was directed to pay a cost of Rs. 3000 to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>