2016 (3) TMI 658

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ashuardhan and Mr. Devender Singh, Advs For the Respondent : None ORDER CM APPL 8261/2016 (exemption) in W.P. (C) 1926/2016 CM APPL 8265/2016 (exemption) in W.P. (C) 1928/2016 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications are disposed of. W.P. (C) 1926/2016 & CM APPL 8260/2016 (for stay) W.P. (C) 1928/2016 & CM APPL 8264/2016 (for stay) 3. Thes....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....entioned applications was not acceded to by the Settlement Commission and while only taking on record the written submissions of the Respondents, and without hearing the Petitioners, orders were reserved by the Settlement Commission. 6. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in S. Govinda Menon v. The Union of India (1967) 2 SCR 566 to urge that a direction be issued to the Set....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....crystallized the settled legal position as to when a writ of prohibition might issue as under: "The jurisdiction for grant of a writ of prohibition is primarily supervisory and the object of that writ is to restrain courts or inferior tribunals from exercising a jurisdiction which they do not possess at all or else to prevent them from exceeding the limits of their jurisdiction. In other words,....