https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325474 The Court dismissed the writ petitions seeking prohibition against the Settlement Commission's proceedings, emphasizing that the petitions were premature as it was not feasible to determine if the petitioners were denied a fair hearing. The Court noted that the dismissal did not prevent the petitioners from challenging the Commission's orders in the future based on the same grounds. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the petitioners were allowed to raise their concerns if necessary in the future, with the issuance of the order dasti. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325474 The Court dismissed the writ petitions seeking prohibition against the Settlement Commission's proceedings, emphasizing that the petitions were premature as it was not feasible to determine if the petitioners were denied a fair hearing. The Court noted that the dismissal did not prevent the petitioners from challenging the Commission's orders in the future based on the same grounds. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the petitioners were allowed to raise their concerns if necessary in the future, with the issuance of the order dasti. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325474