Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (2) TMI 134

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the order dated 27.2.2002 and to forbear the respondent from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the property. 2. The transferor one Shri.Raman Lal N.Trivedi and the transferee M/s.Jain Housing and Construction Ltd. filed Form 37-I for the transfer of the property at New No.36, Venkatarama Iyer Street, Chennai-17, for an apparent consideration of Rs.52,00,000/- (Rupees fifty two lak....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e was in occupation from the year 1990 and that he had filed documents before the City Civil Court in O.S.No.6808 of 2001.  In the circumstances, the petitioner submitted that the respondent could not require a person in lawful possession to vacate the property. 3. W.P.No.8584  of 2002 is against the order dated 27.2.2002 wherein the respondent had called upon the petitioner herein to s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aintenance of the property, including payment of electricity and he needs to be paid a sum of Rs.2,50,000/-.  He requested that the claim, hence, be considered and orders passed. 6. As seen from the order dated 27.2.2002, the respondent had clearly stated that the petitioner had not produced any evidence in support of his claim and that the occupancy of the portion itself was found to be unl....