2007 (2) TMI 134
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the order dated 27.2.2002 and to forbear the respondent from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the property. 2. The transferor one Shri.Raman Lal N.Trivedi and the transferee M/s.Jain Housing and Construction Ltd. filed Form 37-I for the transfer of the property at New No.36, Venkatarama Iyer Street, Chennai-17, for an apparent consideration of Rs.52,00,000/- (Rupees fifty two lak....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e was in occupation from the year 1990 and that he had filed documents before the City Civil Court in O.S.No.6808 of 2001. In the circumstances, the petitioner submitted that the respondent could not require a person in lawful possession to vacate the property. 3. W.P.No.8584 of 2002 is against the order dated 27.2.2002 wherein the respondent had called upon the petitioner herein to s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aintenance of the property, including payment of electricity and he needs to be paid a sum of Rs.2,50,000/-. He requested that the claim, hence, be considered and orders passed. 6. As seen from the order dated 27.2.2002, the respondent had clearly stated that the petitioner had not produced any evidence in support of his claim and that the occupancy of the portion itself was found to be unl....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI