https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2374 A writ challenge to pre-emptive purchase under Section 269-UD(1) and the related declaration that an encumbrance was void under Section 269-UE(1) was rejected because the petitioner produced no evidence of tenancy or lawful occupation. The authority had found that the encumbrance was created to defeat Chapter XX-C, and that factual finding was not displaced by any material before the Court. On that basis, the Court found no ground to interfere and left the order directing surrender of possession undisturbed. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2374 A writ challenge to pre-emptive purchase under Section 269-UD(1) and the related declaration that an encumbrance was void under Section 269-UE(1) was rejected because the petitioner produced no evidence of tenancy or lawful occupation. The authority had found that the encumbrance was created to defeat Chapter XX-C, and that factual finding was not displaced by any material before the Court. On that basis, the Court found no ground to interfere and left the order directing surrender of possession undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2374