2015 (12) TMI 1385
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h Kumar Singla, Advocate AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to refund the excess ITC to the petitioner in view of order dated 26.6.2013 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.2 along with all consequential benefits. 2. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., 2005, the refund is to be issued within a period of sixty days from the date of submission of application for refund. The petitioner had got only one refund for the first quarter amounting to Rs. 31,73,342/- on 13.2.2012 without any interest and after delay of more than two months. However, no refund was made for the second and third quarters after the expiry of sixty days from the date of claim....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or refund. On 11.4.2014, the petitioner submitted a written request and again visited the office of respondents No.3 and 4 and submitted an application dated 19.5.2014 to respondent No.3 for refund along with interest. However, respondent No.4 vide order dated 21.5.2014 (Annexure P-3) released a sum of Rs. 10,06,020/- as against refund claim of Rs. 17,34,521/-. The petitioner moved an application ....
TaxTMI