https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270081 The High Court directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's application for rectification and refund of excess input tax credit, along with the supporting calculations, without expressing any view on the merits. The respondents were required to afford an opportunity of hearing and pass a speaking order within one month of receiving the certified copy of the order. If the petitioner was found entitled to the refund, the refundable amount had to be released within the following month in accordance with law. The writ petition was thus disposed of by mandating administrative reconsideration rather than adjudication of the substantive refund claim. en-us Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270081 The High Court directed fresh consideration of the petitioner's application for rectification and refund of excess input tax credit, along with the supporting calculations, without expressing any view on the merits. The respondents were required to afford an opportunity of hearing and pass a speaking order within one month of receiving the certified copy of the order. If the petitioner was found entitled to the refund, the refundable amount had to be released within the following month in accordance with law. The writ petition was thus disposed of by mandating administrative reconsideration rather than adjudication of the substantive refund claim. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270081