2015 (12) TMI 947

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt : Mr. Akbar Basha, C.A. For The Respondent : Mr. N. Jagadish, A.R. Per : B.S.V.MURTHY Both the appeals involve a common issue namely refund of CENVAT credit accumulated and claimed under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. Appeal No. C/775/2010 2. This appeal relates to refund claim filed for the period from December 2006 to March 2007. 3. The claim for the month of December 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....not want to claim refund for October and November 2006, the refund claim would have been filed only for December 2006. Unless, I am able to take a view that the claim which was returned for the period from October 2006 to December 2006 was resubmitted in the eyes of law, it may not be possible to uphold the stand taken by the appellant that the part of the refund claim submitted has to be treated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ince in any case, the appeals are proposed to be remanded to the original authority, it will be appropriate to leave it to the original authority. However, the denial of the entire refund claim on the ground that a portion of it was taken before payment of service tax was made is not correct. It is the appellant's claim that claim for Rs. 52,775/- could not have been denied since this claim was ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n organization, amongst others and therefore this credit could not have been denied.  Appeal No. 776/2010 7. This appeal relates to the claim for refund from April 2007 to September 2007. In this case also entire amount of credit of Rs. 3,84,175/- has been denied on the ground that a portion of the CENVAT credit was taken before payment of service tax was made. This issue has already be....