https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269643 The tribunal held that the refund claims for different periods should be treated as separate claims and emphasized the need for distinct submissions. The appellant's claim for a refund was rejected due to timing issues, but the tribunal disagreed with the blanket denial and remanded the issue for further verification. Specific amounts were denied for services related to outward transportation and audit services, with the tribunal remanding the matters for reevaluation. The appellant's right to present their case before a final decision was emphasized. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269643 The tribunal held that the refund claims for different periods should be treated as separate claims and emphasized the need for distinct submissions. The appellant's claim for a refund was rejected due to timing issues, but the tribunal disagreed with the blanket denial and remanded the issue for further verification. Specific amounts were denied for services related to outward transportation and audit services, with the tribunal remanding the matters for reevaluation. The appellant's right to present their case before a final decision was emphasized. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 06 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269643