2015 (12) TMI 152
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....vocates, for the Appellant. Shri Ganesh Havannur, AC (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The appeal along with stay application has been filed against the impugned order dated 14-3-2014 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-II), Bangalore, wherein penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 in the adjudication order has been upheld. 2. The brief facts of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....penalty is justified. The appeal was allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) by confirming the penal liability. Hence, the present appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Heard the ld. counsels of both the parties and perused the records. 4. I find that neither any specific allegations have been made in the show cause notice nor any findings recorded in the impugned order that non-payment of....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI