<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 152 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268848</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal found no evidence of wilful suppression to evade service tax payment, leading to the decision that there was no merit in the penalty imposition upheld by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-II), Bangalore.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:31:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 152 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268848</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal found no evidence of wilful suppression to evade service tax payment, leading to the decision that there was no merit in the penalty imposition upheld by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-II), Bangalore.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>