Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (11) TMI 1462

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lates to one bill of entry. It is number 6710287 dated 2nd May, 2012 filed by M/s. S. Guho Sarkar & Company. The said bill of entry was ostensibly filed by the aforesaid firm on behalf of M/s. Zen Electronics. An alleged authorisation letter of Zen was signed and also tendered. According to the Revenue this authorisation letter was not signed by Nityananda Dey, the declared importer or any other a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....documents were not made available to them : "1. Bill of entry number 6935877 dated 26.05.2012. 2. Show cause notice, if any issued to M/s. Zen Electronics and the outcome of the proceedings. 3. Declaration filed in respect of the bill of entry number 6710287 dated 02.05.2012." Hence, there was breach of the principles of natural justice. The learned Commissioner in paragraph 25 of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the learned Commissioner dealing with the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners to "cross-examine the above persons". Even if a person's testimony was not being relied upon, he could still be cross-examined or called as a witness by the other party for obtaining some favourable statements, which the other party may use. That right seems to have been denied. But, otherwise, the order ....