https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268653 The judgment addressed the controversy surrounding the alleged use of a forged document in customs clearance, resulting in the revocation of the customs house agent license. While acknowledging a flaw in denying the opportunity for cross-examination, the Commissioner's order was generally upheld as well-reasoned. The judgment directed the petitioners to appeal, allowing them to present evidence to establish the authenticity of the document and ensuring the right to examine key individuals and relevant documents. The appeal process was to be conducted promptly, affording the petitioners the opportunity to address any additional concerns from the original order. en-us Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268653 The judgment addressed the controversy surrounding the alleged use of a forged document in customs clearance, resulting in the revocation of the customs house agent license. While acknowledging a flaw in denying the opportunity for cross-examination, the Commissioner's order was generally upheld as well-reasoned. The judgment directed the petitioners to appeal, allowing them to present evidence to establish the authenticity of the document and ensuring the right to examine key individuals and relevant documents. The appeal process was to be conducted promptly, affording the petitioners the opportunity to address any additional concerns from the original order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268653