Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (11) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... present appeal is as to whether the services provided by the appellants filed under the category of "Consulting Engineer Services" leviable to Service Tax. 2.The facts of the case are that the appellants based in Switzerland are engaged in business of research, development, manufacture and sale of the products "Ingranox". They have also established plants, factories, research and testing labor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tax returns. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the appellants, which has been decided by the adjudicating authority with orders as above. 3.The revenue seeks to tax the appellants for the services rendered by them under the category of "Consulting Engineer Services", show cause notice issued to them stands adjudicated by the authorities below. 4.On the other hand, the appellant&#3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unal) = 2004 (172) E.L.T. 400 (T) (iii)Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. CCE, Aurangabad - 2006 (3) S.T.R. 411 (Tribunal) = 2005 (179) E.L.T. 481 (T) (iv) Transweigh (India) Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai - 2006 (3) S.T.R. 281 (Tribunal) = 2004 (170) E.L.T. 527 (T) (v) Essel Propack Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai - 2006 (1) S.T.R. 150 (Tribunal) = 2006 (72) RLT 499 (CESTAT.-Mum) Shri Gupta further submits that the sole de....