<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 23 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in line with the legal precedents cited by the appellants. The appeal was allowed for remand based on the established case law, emphasizing the importance of aligning decisions with judicial pronouncements in tax matters to ensure consistency and fairness in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 23 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in line with the legal precedents cited by the appellants. The appeal was allowed for remand based on the established case law, emphasizing the importance of aligning decisions with judicial pronouncements in tax matters to ensure consistency and fairness in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>