2015 (10) TMI 1876

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....17/Hyd/2008,ITA No. 121/Hyd/2010,ITA No. 120/Hyd/2010 For the Petitioner : Shri K.C. Devdas, AR For the Respondent  : Shri Rajat Mitra, DR ORDER PER B. RAMAKOTAIAH, A.M. : These 18 Miscellaneous Applications are filed for recalling the order passed on 23-09-2011 in various Miscellaneous Applications dismissing them ex-parte for want of prosecuting these objections. Assessee preferred the present applications requesting to recall them. 2. Briefly stated facts are, assessee has preferred 18 appeals in respective assessees' cases and when the cases were posted originally, none appeared on behalf of assessees and hence the appeals were dismissed for non-prosecution vide common order dt. 18-10-2010. Subsequently, asses....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was no occasion to apply this rule. 7. The date of hearing posting the hearing of the Miscellaneous Application on 23.09.2011 was perhaps sent to the old address without noticing the change of address communicated on 28.02.2011 which is: Plot No. 80, Road No. 9, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033.  Phone No. 040 2355584 8. There have been a lot of disturbances in the business of the entities. We have been subject to many procrastinated enquiries by Investigating Agencies throwing our Administrative Office out of gear. 9. The Miscellaneous Applications were posted on 23.09.2011. The Appellant was not aware of the date of posting. Besides for the reasons stated at Serial No. 6 many compliances were inadvertently not ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 02-2015 correspondence made with Asst. Registrar and then only assessees obtained the copy of the order dismissing the Miscellaneous Applications and they preferred the present Miscellaneous Applications vide application dt. 20-04-2015. It was submitted that the request is only for recalling the Miscellaneous Applications so that they can pursue the main appeals, if those Miscellaneous Applications are entertained. 4. Ld. DR however, objected to state that assessees have not pursued either the appeals or the Miscellaneous Applications. 5. We have considered the request of assessees and contents of the Miscellaneous Petitions. As seen from the Miscellaneous Applications itself, assessees have not given the correct address in the Misce....