<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1876 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266601</link>
    <description>The judgment allowed the restoration of 18 Miscellaneous Applications by recalling the order dismissing them for non-prosecution. The assessees were directed to pay a cost for failing to provide correct addresses, highlighting the importance of proper address communication to ensure effective service of notices. The tribunal emphasized compliance with address communication rules and the need for assessees to update their addresses promptly to avoid future non-compliance issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1876 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266601</link>
      <description>The judgment allowed the restoration of 18 Miscellaneous Applications by recalling the order dismissing them for non-prosecution. The assessees were directed to pay a cost for failing to provide correct addresses, highlighting the importance of proper address communication to ensure effective service of notices. The tribunal emphasized compliance with address communication rules and the need for assessees to update their addresses promptly to avoid future non-compliance issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>