2015 (10) TMI 1147
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Advocate for the Appellant For the Respondent : Shri R.K. Mishra, DR for the Respondent ORDER Per Ashok Jindal: Cenvat Credit has been denied to the appellant on the following grounds: a) Rs. 35,634/- was disallowed on the account of invoice with the previous address of the appellant; b) Rs. 2414/- was disallowed on account of Telephone bills are in the name of Head....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Credit on these services. Therefore, I allow the Cenvat Credit on these services. 4. Rs. 2414/- was disallowed on account of telephone bills are in the name of head office and same has been used by the officials at their residence and residential premises has been taken on rent where as per rent deed no commercial activity can be carried out by the appellant. I find that in this case bills are....
TaxTMI