<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1147 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat Credit on various disputed expenses, including invoice discrepancies, telephone bills, service tax for job worker premises, dismantling of old building, and Chartered Accountant services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing compliance with Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004, and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1147 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat Credit on various disputed expenses, including invoice discrepancies, telephone bills, service tax for job worker premises, dismantling of old building, and Chartered Accountant services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing compliance with Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004, and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>